Gibeau, Michael L., Herrero, S., McLellan, B., and Woods,
J. G. 2001. Managing for Grizzly Bear Security
Areas in Banff National Park and The Central Canadian Rocky Mountains. Ursus 12:121-130
Note: The Abstract of this paper is displayed below.
You also have the option of downloading the complete paper in PDF format.
MANAGING FOR GRIZZLY BEAR
SECURITY AREAS IN BANFF NATIONAL PARK AND THE CENTRAL CANADIAN ROCKY
MOUNTAINS
Abstract: The need for security areas in which grizzly bears
(Ursus arctos) may rarely encounter humans and maintain wary behavior is
not explicitly addressed by cumulative effect modeling (CEM). In addition,
CEM does not assess the value to bears of small areas left between zones
of human disturbance. We developed a predictive GIS based model of adult
female grizzly bear security areas in the Central Canadian Rocky Mountains
to provide agency planners with a tool that addresses these shortfalls.
Our study area included 4 major jurisdictions: Alberta provincial lands,
British Columbia provincial lands, Kananaskis Country improvement district
in Alberta, and National Park lands in both provinces. Starting with the
total land base in each jurisdiction, we progressively removed areas of
unsuitable habitat (e.g., rock and ice), habitat within 500 m of high
human use (>100 human visits/month), and areas of insufficient size based
on an average daily feeding radius (polygons <9 km2). We identified the
remaining lands as secure areas. We then tested the hypothesis that female
grizzly bear use of security areas differs from the landscape as a whole
based on radio telemetry data. Of the 4 jurisdictions in the Central
Canadian Rocky Mountains, the largest percent of secure habitat was on
British Columbia provincial lands. Of the land surface area of the Banff,
Yoho, and Kootenay National Parks, 48% is unsuitable for grizzly bears,
primarily because it is composed of rock and ice. This is unfortunate,
because it is assumed that these national parks form productive core
refugia for grizzly bears. By reconstructing past human use and
forecasting into the future for Banff National Park and Kananaskis
Country, we demonstrate progressive loss of security areas. We found that
an average of 69% of the land within grizzly bear home ranges was secure
using our sample of 28 radiocollared adult females. Resource selection
indices from these bears demonstrated selection of security areas within
their home ranges. Existing mortality and translocation data, combined
with our findings of low security and high habitat fragmentation within
some adult female home ranges, give quantitative substance to the
assertion that grizzly bears in and around Banff National Park and
Kananaskis Country exist in one of the most human dominated landscapes
where they still survive. Access and development management are key to
grizzly bear persistence in the region.
|